VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE
VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and GFEA.DE (VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VVMX.DE is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while GFEA.DE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VVMX.DE returned 2.20%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for GFEA.DE. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVMX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GFEA.DE.
Performance
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVMX.DE achieves a 21.99% return, which is significantly higher than GFEA.DE's 6.86% return.
VVMX.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 21.99%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 124.83%
- 3Y*
- 2.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFEA.DE
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 21.99% | 68.45% | -30.81% | -21.17% | -26.46% | 16.96% |
GFEA.DE VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 6.86% | -2.31% | 12.21% | 6.69% | -7.67% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVMX.DE and GFEA.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VVMX.DE
GFEA.DE
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVMX.DE | GFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.27 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | 3.99 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.48 | 13.26 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than GFEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and GFEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVMX.DE | GFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.26% | -22.88% | -50.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.68% | -2.45% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.20% | -9.97% | -51.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.23% | -1.22% | -29.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.03% | -5.01% | -36.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.66% | 0.74% | +7.92% |
Volatility
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) at 2.87%. This indicates that VVMX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVMX.DE | GFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.77% | 2.87% | +9.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 5.37% | +28.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.34% | 6.74% | +40.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 7.80% | +28.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 10.57% | +25.87% |
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GFEA.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVMX.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VVMX.DE nor GFEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VVMX.DE and GFEA.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GFEA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GFEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
VVMX.DE is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while GFEA.DE is High Yield Bonds. VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while GFEA.DE tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.40% for GFEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for VVMX.DE and GFEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer