PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GFEA.DE
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.72%-2.31%12.20%6.70%-1.71%
XZHY.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.99%-3.17%13.38%8.40%-5.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFEA.DE achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than XZHY.DE's 0.99% return.


GFEA.DE

1D
-0.74%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.97%
1Y
-0.81%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*

XZHY.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
0.99%
6M
2.12%
1Y
-0.29%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFEA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XZHY.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFEA.DE
GFEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XZHY.DE
XZHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XZHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFEA.DEXZHY.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

-0.03

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

0.01

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.00

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.05

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.41

-0.13

-0.28

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the XZHY.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFEA.DE and XZHY.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFEA.DEXZHY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

-0.03

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.43

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between GFEA.DE and XZHY.DE is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFEA.DE nor XZHY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.87%, which is greater than XZHY.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEA.DE and XZHY.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFEA.DEXZHY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.87%

-11.51%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-7.04%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-5.04%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-4.50%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.93%

-0.58%

Volatility

GFEA.DE vs. XZHY.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHY.DE) at 1.77%. This indicates that GFEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZHY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFEA.DEXZHY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

1.77%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.00%

4.09%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

8.32%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

7.69%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.56%

7.69%

+1.87%