VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE
VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and ARAW.DE (abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VVMX.DE is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while ARAW.DE is a Materials fund actively managed by abrdn. VVMX.DE is passively managed, while ARAW.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, VVMX.DE returned 147.14% vs 132.02% for ARAW.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VVMX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ARAW.DE.
Performance
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVMX.DE achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly higher than ARAW.DE's 26.31% return.
VVMX.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 6M
- 34.99%
- 1Y
- 147.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARAW.DE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 34.67%
- 1Y
- 132.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 30.24% | 81.03% |
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 26.31% | 94.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVMX.DE and ARAW.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VVMX.DE and ARAW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VVMX.DE
ARAW.DE
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VVMX.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.60 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.59 | 6.69 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.66 | 25.81 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VVMX.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36 | 4.36 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 4.33 | -4.31 |
Drawdowns
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than ARAW.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and ARAW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVMX.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.26% | -20.41% | -52.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.40% | -20.41% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.51% | -4.46% | -21.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.23% | -3.15% | -38.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.89% | 5.30% | +2.59% |
Volatility
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.59% compared to abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) at 11.01%. This indicates that VVMX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARAW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVMX.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.59% | 11.01% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.22% | 25.93% | +6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.13% | 31.38% | +14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 30.66% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 30.66% | +5.72% |
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARAW.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVMX.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VVMX.DE nor ARAW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VVMX.DE and ARAW.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARAW.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
VVMX.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while ARAW.DE is Materials. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.45% for ARAW.DE.
Find the right allocation for VVMX.DE and ARAW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer