PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVL.TO achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than ZPR.TO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VVL.TO has outperformed ZPR.TO with an annualized return of 12.27%, while ZPR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.


VVL.TO

1D
-0.88%
1M
3.91%
6M
11.32%
YTD
17.21%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
12.27%

ZPR.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
2.09%
6M
7.62%
YTD
8.50%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
17.21%18.01%15.01%16.57%0.50%29.77%-3.29%13.44%-9.39%12.34%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
8.50%18.58%26.58%7.21%-17.66%23.77%6.00%1.94%-9.77%14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VVL.TO and ZPR.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2016

0.31

The correlation between VVL.TO and ZPR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVL.TO
VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPR.TO
ZPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVL.TOZPR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.81

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

6.83

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.60

38.94

-25.34

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVL.TO and ZPR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPR.TO drawdown of -44.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and ZPR.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVL.TOZPR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.88%

-44.72%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-2.47%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-8.75%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-23.06%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.88%

-44.13%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

0.00%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-9.20%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.43%

+1.81%

Volatility

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) at 0.94%. This indicates that VVL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVL.TOZPR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

0.94%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

2.71%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

4.31%

+9.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

8.32%

+7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

11.42%

+7.35%

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVL.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPR.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVL.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Dividend Comparison

VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than ZPR.TO's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
1.61%1.89%2.19%2.69%2.57%1.50%1.70%2.65%2.15%1.35%0.60%0.00%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
5.03%4.86%4.93%5.92%5.97%4.66%5.48%5.09%4.82%4.08%5.14%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVL.TO and ZPR.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPR.TO.

VVL.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ZPR.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VVL.TO and 0.45% for ZPR.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVL.TO and ZPR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer