VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO
VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD) and CPD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VVL.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while CPD.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR. VVL.TO is actively managed, while CPD.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VVL.TO returned 12.27%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for CPD.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVL.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CPD.TO.
Performance
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVL.TO achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than CPD.TO's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VVL.TO has outperformed CPD.TO with an annualized return of 12.27%, while CPD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.55% annualized return.
VVL.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
CPD.TO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 12.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 17.21% | 18.01% | 15.01% | 16.57% | 0.50% | 29.77% | -3.29% | 13.44% | -9.39% | 12.34% |
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF | 5.80% | 16.10% | 23.31% | 6.23% | -19.19% | 18.85% | 5.35% | 3.35% | -9.05% | 13.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVL.TO and CPD.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2016 | 0.31 |
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Healthcare
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Technology
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Industrials
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Energy
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
Communication Services
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Basic Materials
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Real Estate
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
-
Utilities
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VVL.TO
CPD.TO
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVL.TO | CPD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.63 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 4.57 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.60 | 22.76 | -9.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.88%, which is greater than CPD.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and CPD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVL.TO | CPD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.88% | -40.92% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -2.70% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -7.65% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -24.12% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.88% | -40.92% | -2.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | 0.00% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -6.71% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 0.54% | +1.70% |
Volatility
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) at 0.70%. This indicates that VVL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVL.TO | CPD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 0.70% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 2.72% | +6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.84% | 4.14% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 7.70% | +8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 10.57% | +8.20% |
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVL.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CPD.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVL.TO vs. CPD.TO - Dividend Comparison
VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than CPD.TO's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF | 4.96% | 4.96% | 5.11% | 5.88% | 5.53% | 4.17% | 4.96% | 5.02% | 4.74% | 4.33% | 4.85% | 5.44% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 1.61% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.57% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.65% | 2.15% | 1.35% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVL.TO and CPD.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CPD.TO.
VVL.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CPD.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VVL.TO and 0.50% for CPD.TO.
Find the right allocation for VVL.TO and CPD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer