VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE
VVGM.DE (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and XDEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - VVGM.DE tracks the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus while XDEB.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VVGM.DE returned 7.42%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for XDEB.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VVGM.DE charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.DE.
Performance
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVGM.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.
VVGM.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEB.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVGM.DE VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.57% | 11.67% | 16.13% | 7.09% | -6.16% | 24.82% | 6.99% |
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.74% | -1.27% | 17.83% | 3.66% | -4.06% | 24.01% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVGM.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VVGM.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VVGM.DE
XDEB.DE
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VVGM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.00 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.02 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | -0.03 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VVGM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | -0.01 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.70 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum XDEB.DE drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVGM.DE and XDEB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVGM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -28.57% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -5.31% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.74% | -13.02% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -13.02% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -6.53% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -5.03% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.37% | +1.09% |
Volatility
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that VVGM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVGM.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 2.63% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 5.56% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 7.86% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 10.16% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 12.03% | +1.69% |
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVGM.DE has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVGM.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VVGM.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VVGM.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for VVGM.DE.
VVGM.DE tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for VVGM.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.
Find the right allocation for VVGM.DE and XDEB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer