VV vs. SIXA
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VV is passively managed, while SIXA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VV returned 12.62%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for SIXA. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.
Performance
VV vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.32% return.
VV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
SIXA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
VV vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.23% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 31.78% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 14.32% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 19.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and SIXA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VV and SIXA has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VV vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VV
SIXA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VV
SIXA
Financial Services
VV
SIXA
Communication Services
VV
SIXA
Consumer Cyclical
VV
SIXA
Healthcare
VV
SIXA
Industrials
VV
SIXA
Consumer Defensive
VV
SIXA
Energy
VV
SIXA
Utilities
VV
SIXA
Real Estate
VV
SIXA
Basic Materials
VV
SIXA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank
VV
SIXA
VV vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VV | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.47 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 13.15 | -3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VV vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SIXA's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SIXA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -18.38% | -36.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -5.59% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -11.22% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -18.38% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -2.96% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.47% | +0.66% |
Volatility
VV vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.46%. This indicates that VV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 2.46% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 6.89% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 8.87% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 12.78% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 13.28% | +4.91% |
VV vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
VV vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VV and SIXA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SIXA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs SIXA's -18.38%.
On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.64% vs 12.62% for VV. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 12.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.02% for VV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VV and SIXA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer