VUSG vs. BND
VUSG (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. VUSG is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUSG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
VUSG vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSG achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.05% return.
VUSG
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
VUSG vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUSG Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF | 4.42% | 3.21% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.05% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSG and BND is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSG vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
VUSG
BND
VUSG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF (VUSG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUSG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
VUSG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSG drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSG and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.14% | -18.58% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -2.67% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.06% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
VUSG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 3.76% | +15.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 6.02% | +13.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 5.53% | +14.09% |
VUSG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUSG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BND's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
VUSG Vanguard Wellington U.S. Growth Active ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSG and BND have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VUSG.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.02% for VUSG.
VUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VUSG and 0.03% for BND.
Find the right allocation for VUSG and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer