PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSFX vs. GFIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VUSFX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSFX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than GFIRX's 7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VUSFX has underperformed GFIRX with an annualized return of 2.71%, while GFIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.32% annualized return.


VUSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
2.71%

GFIRX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.43%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.26%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUSFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares
1.42%5.11%6.11%5.53%-0.38%0.08%2.10%3.39%2.10%1.37%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.91%0.54%-5.17%-3.87%20.44%4.86%6.94%2.61%-2.24%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSFX and GFIRX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

-0.13

The correlation between VUSFX and GFIRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (5 years) to -0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSFX vs. GFIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSFX
VUSFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VUSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

GFIRX
GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VUSFX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUSFXGFIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.69

1.44

+3.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.20

3.74

+14.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

108.57

12.13

+96.44

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSFX Sharpe Ratio is 7.69, which is higher than the GFIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSFX and GFIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSFXGFIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.69

2.35

+5.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.35

0.32

+4.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

4.00

0.37

+3.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.00

0.29

+3.71

Drawdowns

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSFX drawdown since its inception was -1.71%, smaller than the maximum GFIRX drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSFX and GFIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSFXGFIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-23.09%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-4.86%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.35%

-22.39%

+22.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.71%

-23.09%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.71%

-23.09%

+21.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.55%

+5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-7.02%

+6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

1.49%

-1.45%

Volatility

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VUSFX) is 0.13%, while Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that VUSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSFXGFIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

2.10%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.41%

6.00%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59%

7.75%

-7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.81%

10.40%

-9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.68%

9.05%

-8.37%

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSFX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GFIRX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUSFX vs. GFIRX - Dividend Comparison

VUSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, while GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%20.11%7.35%1.21%7.06%0.16%0.49%0.00%3.98%
VUSFX
Vanguard Ultra-Short-Term Bond Fund Admiral Shares
4.53%4.73%5.52%4.15%1.38%0.53%1.62%2.68%2.23%1.52%1.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUSFX and GFIRX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFIRX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to VUSFX (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUSFX dropped -1.71% vs GFIRX's -23.09%.

VUSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.69 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSFX and GFIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer