PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSD.L achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than VWRD.L's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VUSD.L has outperformed VWRD.L with an annualized return of 15.21%, while VWRD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.64% annualized return.


VUSD.L

1D
0.02%
1M
3.22%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.77%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.21%

VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.47%
YTD
11.63%
6M
12.71%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUSD.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.34%17.37%25.26%26.78%-18.74%29.43%17.63%30.53%-5.54%21.66%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.63%22.38%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSD.L and VWRD.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2012

0.92

The correlation between VUSD.L and VWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUSD.L
VWRD.L

Technology

35.7%
30.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
16.1%

Communication Services

11.3%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.1%

Industrials

8.3%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
4.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.6%

Technology

VUSD.L
35.7%
VWRD.L
30.2%

Financial Services

VUSD.L
11.6%
VWRD.L
16.1%

Communication Services

VUSD.L
11.3%
VWRD.L
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VUSD.L
10.2%
VWRD.L
9.1%

Healthcare

VUSD.L
8.5%
VWRD.L
8.1%

Industrials

VUSD.L
8.3%
VWRD.L
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

VUSD.L
4.9%
VWRD.L
4.9%

Energy

VUSD.L
3.5%
VWRD.L
4.3%

Utilities

VUSD.L
2.4%
VWRD.L
2.9%

Real Estate

VUSD.L
1.9%
VWRD.L
1.6%

Basic Materials

VUSD.L
1.8%
VWRD.L
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSD.L
VUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUSD.LVWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.24

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.57

13.61

+0.96

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSD.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSD.LVWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.73

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.80

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.82

+0.17

Drawdowns

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRD.L drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSD.L and VWRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSD.LVWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.93%

-33.83%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-8.80%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.44%

-16.25%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.42%

-26.02%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-33.83%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.78%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-4.62%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.10%

-0.19%

Volatility

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSD.L) is 3.19%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that VUSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSD.LVWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.88%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

9.80%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

12.39%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

15.32%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

15.72%

+0.53%

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSD.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUSD.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

VUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VWRD.L's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUSD.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.86%0.94%1.03%1.22%1.43%1.06%1.34%1.45%1.78%1.54%1.72%1.78%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VUSD.L and VWRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUSD.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VUSD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. VUSD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSD.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSD.L and VWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer