PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUSA.L is traded in GBP, while ZPA5.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPA5.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than ZPA5.DE's 6.25% return.


VUSA.L

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.56%
6M
9.55%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
14.45%
ALL TIME*
16.14%

ZPA5.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.55%
6M
7.61%
YTD
6.25%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.45%9.39%27.33%4.02%
ZPA5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
6.25%8.11%28.25%4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2023

0.93

The correlation between VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPA5.DE
ZPA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ZPA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUSA.LZPA5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

0.79

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

1.42

+8.71

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the ZPA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than ZPA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSA.LZPA5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-21.71%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-20.89%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-8.24%

+6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-6.00%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

11.61%

-9.62%

Volatility

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) is 2.97%, while Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that VUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSA.LZPA5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.13%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

8.27%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

24.49%

-13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

19.22%

-4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

19.22%

-3.70%

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUSA.L vs. ZPA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ZPA5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.74%
ZPA5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ZPA5.DE is ESG. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZPA5.DE tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and ZPA5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer