VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUSA.L returned 14.45%/yr vs 24.64%/yr for XLKQ.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.

Performance

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VUSA.L is traded in GBP, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 16.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VUSA.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 14.45%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.64% annualized return.

VUSA.L

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: 9.55%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: 13.22%
• 10Y*: 14.45%
• ALL TIME*: 16.14%

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -5.66%
• 6M: 19.21%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 28.96%
• 5Y*: 22.20%
• 10Y*: 24.64%
• ALL TIME*: 17.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF	9.45%	9.39%	27.33%	19.82%	-9.02%	30.97%	13.65%	26.53%	-0.10%	10.72%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	16.15%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	37.93%	44.38%	2.54%	21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSA.L and XLKQ.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012	0.84

The correlation between VUSA.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUSA.L	XLKQ.L
Technology	38.6%	91.2%
Financial Services	11.4%	7.3%
Communication Services	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Industrials	8.5%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSA.L

VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUSA.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.42	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.95	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	1.78	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	4.31	+5.82

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSA.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUSA.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.48%	-38.43%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-16.76%	+9.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.93%	-28.74%	+7.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.93%	-28.74%	+7.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.48%	-28.74%	+3.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-8.84%	+7.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.14%	-8.07%	+4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	6.94%	-4.95%

Volatility

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) is 2.97%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that VUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUSA.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	7.37%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	16.30%	-8.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	21.11%	-10.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.35%	26.43%	-12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	23.46%	-7.94%

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUSA.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF	0.89%	0.95%	1.00%	1.24%	1.41%	1.04%	1.44%	1.50%	1.72%	1.61%	1.58%	1.74%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUSA.L and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

VUSA.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUSA.L or XLKQ.L?

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUSA.L or XLKQ.L?

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

What is the main difference between VUSA.L and XLKQ.L?

VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.