PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly lower than VWRP.L's 11.92% return.


VUSA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
5.52%
YTD
10.52%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%

VWRP.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.78%
YTD
11.92%
6M
11.87%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.52%9.39%27.33%19.81%-9.02%30.98%13.66%2.09%
VWRP.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
11.92%13.94%19.60%15.64%-8.41%20.00%12.27%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSA.L and VWRP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019

0.95

The correlation between VUSA.L and VWRP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUSA.L
VWRP.L

Technology

35.7%
29.0%

Financial Services

11.6%
16.1%

Communication Services

11.3%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.0%

Industrials

8.3%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.8%

Technology

VUSA.L
35.7%
VWRP.L
29.0%

Financial Services

VUSA.L
11.6%
VWRP.L
16.1%

Communication Services

VUSA.L
11.3%
VWRP.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VUSA.L
10.2%
VWRP.L
9.4%

Healthcare

VUSA.L
8.5%
VWRP.L
8.0%

Industrials

VUSA.L
8.3%
VWRP.L
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

VUSA.L
4.9%
VWRP.L
5.0%

Energy

VUSA.L
3.5%
VWRP.L
4.2%

Utilities

VUSA.L
2.4%
VWRP.L
2.7%

Real Estate

VUSA.L
1.9%
VWRP.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

VUSA.L
1.8%
VWRP.L
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRP.L
VWRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUSA.LVWRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.55

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

4.20

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

17.06

-2.04

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSA.L and VWRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSA.LVWRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.87

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.97

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.82

+0.24

Drawdowns

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRP.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and VWRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSA.LVWRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.47%

-25.10%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-7.10%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

-17.64%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-17.64%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.46%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-3.39%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.75%

+0.18%

Volatility

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) is 2.63%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that VUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSA.LVWRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.95%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.68%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

10.37%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.29%

12.87%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

14.96%

+0.68%

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRP.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUSA.L vs. VWRP.L - Dividend Comparison

VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.87%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.73%
VWRP.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VUSA.L and VWRP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRP.L.

VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VWRP.L is Global Equities. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.22% for VWRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and VWRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer