VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L
VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and VAGS.L (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VAGS.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUSA.L returned 14.94%/yr vs -0.25%/yr for VAGS.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. VUSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VAGS.L.
Performance
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than VAGS.L's 0.19% return.
VUSA.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
VAGS.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.52% | 9.39% | 27.33% | 19.81% | -9.02% | 30.98% | 13.66% | 6.25% |
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating | 0.19% | 4.96% | 2.39% | 5.94% | -13.72% | -2.14% | 5.52% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSA.L and VAGS.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019 | -0.05 |
The correlation between VUSA.L and VAGS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Financial Services
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
Communication Services
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Healthcare
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Industrials
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Energy
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Utilities
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Real Estate
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Basic Materials
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUSA.L
VAGS.L
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUSA.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.15 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 1.17 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 3.41 | +11.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUSA.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 0.89 | +1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | -0.05 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.12 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and VAGS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSA.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -17.99% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -2.67% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.94% | -3.93% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.94% | -17.60% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -3.70% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -6.65% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 0.91% | +1.02% |
Volatility
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) at 1.44%. This indicates that VUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSA.L | VAGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 1.44% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 2.76% | +4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 3.51% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 4.86% | +9.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 4.57% | +11.07% |
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison
VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAGS.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSA.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAGS.L.
VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VAGS.L is Global Bonds. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.
Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and VAGS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer