PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than VAGS.L's 0.19% return.


VUSA.L

1D
0.03%
1M
5.52%
YTD
10.52%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%

VAGS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.52%9.39%27.33%19.81%-9.02%30.98%13.66%6.25%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.19%4.96%2.39%5.94%-13.72%-2.14%5.52%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSA.L and VAGS.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019

-0.05

The correlation between VUSA.L and VAGS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUSA.L
VAGS.L

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%
100.0%

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VUSA.L
35.7%
VAGS.L

-

Financial Services

VUSA.L
11.6%
VAGS.L
100.0%

Communication Services

VUSA.L
11.3%
VAGS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VUSA.L
10.2%
VAGS.L

-

Healthcare

VUSA.L
8.5%
VAGS.L

-

Industrials

VUSA.L
8.3%
VAGS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VUSA.L
4.9%
VAGS.L

-

Energy

VUSA.L
3.5%
VAGS.L

-

Utilities

VUSA.L
2.4%
VAGS.L

-

Real Estate

VUSA.L
1.9%
VAGS.L

-

Basic Materials

VUSA.L
1.8%
VAGS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUSA.LVAGS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.15

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

1.17

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

3.41

+11.61

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSA.L and VAGS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSA.LVAGS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

0.89

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

-0.05

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.12

+0.94

Drawdowns

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and VAGS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSA.LVAGS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.47%

-17.99%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-2.67%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

-3.93%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-17.60%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-3.70%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-6.65%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

0.91%

+1.02%

Volatility

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) at 1.44%. This indicates that VUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSA.LVAGS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

1.44%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

2.76%

+4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

3.51%

+7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.29%

4.86%

+9.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

4.57%

+11.07%

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUSA.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison

VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.87%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUSA.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAGS.L.

VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VAGS.L is Global Bonds. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and VAGS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer