VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L
VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FTWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VUSA.L returned 29.10% vs 30.02% for FTWG.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FTWG.L.
Performance
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUSA.L is traded in GBP, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's 11.87% return.
VUSA.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
FTWG.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.52% | 9.39% | 27.33% | 8.59% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 11.87% | 14.12% | 19.92% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSA.L and FTWG.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VUSA.L and FTWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Financial Services
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Communication Services
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Healthcare
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Industrials
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Consumer Defensive
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Energy
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Utilities
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Real Estate
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Basic Materials
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUSA.L
FTWG.L
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUSA.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.56 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 4.23 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 17.22 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUSA.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.92 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.55 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and FTWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSA.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -17.78% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -7.11% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.42% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -1.99% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.75% | +0.18% |
Volatility
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) is 2.63%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that VUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSA.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 3.04% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 7.59% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 10.28% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 11.89% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 11.89% | +3.75% |
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUSA.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than FTWG.L's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VUSA.L and FTWG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FTWG.L.
VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while FTWG.L is Global Equities. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.15% for FTWG.L.
Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and FTWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer