PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VUS.TO

1D
0.47%
1M
4.41%
YTD
10.47%
6M
8.73%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
13.08%

ZEQL.TO

1D
0.74%
1M
5.81%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VUS.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUS.TO
VUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEQL.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUS.TOZEQL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUS.TOZEQL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

2.21

-1.40

Drawdowns

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS.TO and ZEQL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUS.TOZEQL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-6.12%

-30.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-1.67%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

Volatility

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUS.TOZEQL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

12.89%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

12.89%

+4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

12.89%

+5.19%

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUS.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQL.TO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUS.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

VUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than ZEQL.TO's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUS.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)
0.75%0.84%0.97%1.07%1.23%0.95%1.11%1.39%1.60%1.32%1.49%1.59%
ZEQL.TO
BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)
0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUS.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEQL.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VUS.TO.

VUS.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while ZEQL.TO tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUS.TO and 0.05% for ZEQL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUS.TO and ZEQL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer