PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VUS.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)) and RUD.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VUS.TO is passively managed, while RUD.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUS.TO returned 13.09%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for RUD.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUS.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for RUD.TO.

Performance

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUS.TO achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than RUD.TO's 8.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VUS.TO having a 13.09% annualized return and RUD.TO not far behind at 13.02%.

VUS.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.98%
YTD
9.96%
6M
8.19%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
13.09%

RUD.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
5.71%
YTD
8.99%
6M
6.16%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
13.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUS.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)		9.96%13.31%22.11%24.21%-20.86%24.87%17.67%29.30%-7.35%20.26%
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)		8.99%7.31%22.78%19.01%-7.35%31.62%8.82%19.60%1.05%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VUS.TO and RUD.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2014

0.62

The correlation between VUS.TO and RUD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VUS.TO
RUD.TO

Technology

31.5%
31.1%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.9%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
13.2%

Industrials

9.9%
8.7%

Communication Services

9.7%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
8.4%

Energy

4.2%
5.0%

Utilities

2.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.5%

Technology

VUS.TO
31.5%
RUD.TO
31.1%

Financial Services

VUS.TO
12.5%
RUD.TO
12.9%

Healthcare

VUS.TO
10.2%
RUD.TO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VUS.TO
10.0%
RUD.TO
13.2%

Industrials

VUS.TO
9.9%
RUD.TO
8.7%

Communication Services

VUS.TO
9.7%
RUD.TO
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

VUS.TO
5.0%
RUD.TO
8.4%

Energy

VUS.TO
4.2%
RUD.TO
5.0%

Utilities

VUS.TO
2.5%
RUD.TO
3.0%

Real Estate

VUS.TO
2.5%
RUD.TO
0.8%

Basic Materials

VUS.TO
2.2%
RUD.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)

RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)

Often compared with VUS.TO:
VUS.TO vs. XEQT.TOVUS.TO vs. VUN.TOVUS.TO vs. VOOVUS.TO vs. SPUSVUS.TO vs. XUU.TOVUS.TO vs. VTIVUS.TO vs. CNCL.TO
Often compared with RUD.TO:
RUD.TO vs. VGG.TORUD.TO vs. ZUQ.TORUD.TO vs. ZGQ.TORUD.TO vs. CEW.TORUD.TO vs. XGRO.TORUD.TO vs. FCUV.TORUD.TO vs. QQC.TO

Return for Risk

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VUS.TO
VUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
RUD.TO
RUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VUS.TORUD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.94
1.81

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.69
2.47

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.34

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

11.90

-0.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the RUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUS.TO and RUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VUS.TORUD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.81

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.90

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.84

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.81

-0.01

Drawdowns

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than RUD.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS.TO and RUD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VUS.TORUD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-29.89%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-6.65%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-28.33%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-28.33%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-29.89%

-6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.40%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-3.99%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.86%

+0.31%

Volatility

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) at 2.59%. This indicates that VUS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VUS.TORUD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.59%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

9.27%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

12.31%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

15.38%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

15.53%

+2.55%

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUS.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RUD.TO's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUS.TO vs. RUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

VUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than RUD.TO's 1.37% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RUD.TO
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)		1.37%1.35%1.16%1.49%1.57%1.10%1.64%1.93%2.01%1.78%1.73%2.12%
VUS.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)		0.75%0.84%0.97%1.07%1.23%0.95%1.11%1.39%1.60%1.32%1.49%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

VUS.TO and RUD.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUS.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RUD.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUS.TO and 0.43% for RUD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUS.TO and RUD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer