PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) and Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUS.TO achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than HBF.TO's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VUS.TO has outperformed HBF.TO with an annualized return of 13.09%, while HBF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


VUS.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.98%
YTD
9.96%
6M
8.19%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
13.09%

HBF.TO

1D
-1.15%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.25%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUS.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)
9.96%13.31%22.11%24.21%-20.86%24.87%17.67%29.30%-7.35%20.26%
HBF.TO
Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)
8.15%15.51%13.12%11.23%-14.97%21.88%11.41%25.99%-4.71%18.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VUS.TO and HBF.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014

0.73

The correlation between VUS.TO and HBF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUS.TO
HBF.TO

Technology

31.5%
29.5%

Financial Services

12.5%
19.7%

Healthcare

10.2%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.9%

Industrials

9.9%
5.4%

Communication Services

9.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
15.1%

Energy

4.2%
5.1%

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Technology

VUS.TO
31.5%
HBF.TO
29.5%

Financial Services

VUS.TO
12.5%
HBF.TO
19.7%

Healthcare

VUS.TO
10.2%
HBF.TO
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VUS.TO
10.0%
HBF.TO
9.9%

Industrials

VUS.TO
9.9%
HBF.TO
5.4%

Communication Services

VUS.TO
9.7%
HBF.TO
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

VUS.TO
5.0%
HBF.TO
15.1%

Energy

VUS.TO
4.2%
HBF.TO
5.1%

Utilities

VUS.TO
2.5%
HBF.TO

-

Real Estate

VUS.TO
2.5%
HBF.TO

-

Basic Materials

VUS.TO
2.2%
HBF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUS.TO
VUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

HBF.TO
HBF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) and Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUS.TOHBF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.25

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

13.35

-2.37

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUS.TO and HBF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUS.TOHBF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.46

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.55

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.66

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.50

+0.31

Drawdowns

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, roughly equal to the maximum HBF.TO drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS.TO and HBF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUS.TOHBF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-35.28%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-7.79%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-15.21%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-23.69%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-35.28%

-1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.15%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-6.77%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.89%

+0.28%

Volatility

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VUS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) at 2.65%. This indicates that VUS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUS.TOHBF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.65%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

7.79%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

10.29%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

14.07%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

16.95%

+1.13%

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUS.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than HBF.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUS.TO vs. HBF.TO - Dividend Comparison

VUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than HBF.TO's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBF.TO
Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)
7.41%7.27%7.48%7.52%7.75%5.62%6.34%6.57%7.72%6.86%7.54%7.74%
VUS.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-hedged)
0.75%0.84%0.97%1.07%1.23%0.95%1.11%1.39%1.60%1.32%1.49%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUS.TO and HBF.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUS.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.

VUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HBF.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUS.TO and 0.75% for HBF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUS.TO and HBF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer