VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - VUN.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUN.TO returned 14.32%/yr vs 18.02%/yr for QQC.TO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUN.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQC.TO.

Performance

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUN.TO achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 20.27% return.

VUN.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.35%
• 6M: 10.48%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 25.15%
• 3Y*: 22.08%
• 5Y*: 14.32%
• 10Y*: 15.26%

QQC.TO

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 16.75%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 1Y: 33.28%
• 3Y*: 26.95%
• 5Y*: 18.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF	14.14%	11.43%	33.76%	23.00%	-14.20%	17.00%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	20.27%	15.38%	35.74%	51.68%	-28.05%	25.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VUN.TO and QQC.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021	0.89

The correlation between VUN.TO and QQC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUN.TO	QQC.TO
Technology	33.5%	59.6%
Financial Services	12.0%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.3%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	11.1%
Industrials	9.8%	2.6%
Healthcare	9.2%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	6.3%
Energy	3.7%	0.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.1%
Utilities	2.3%	1.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.0%

Return for Risk

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUN.TO

VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUN.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.86	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.45	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	2.75	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.92	8.45	+2.47

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUN.TO and QQC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUN.TO and QQC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUN.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.19%	-31.81%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-12.14%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.88%	-22.58%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.67%	-31.81%	+8.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-3.36%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-7.93%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	3.95%	-1.64%

Volatility

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) is 3.77%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a volatility of 8.01%. This indicates that VUN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUN.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	8.01%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	14.79%	-5.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	18.02%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	21.26%	-5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	21.05%	-4.32%

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUN.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUN.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than QQC.TO's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.32%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF	0.76%	0.84%	0.93%	1.10%	1.21%	0.97%	1.15%	1.45%	1.52%	1.39%	1.50%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUN.TO and QQC.TO in my portfolio?

VUN.TO and QQC.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUN.TO or QQC.TO?

On fees, VUN.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUN.TO or QQC.TO?

VUN.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC.TO.

What is the main difference between VUN.TO and QQC.TO?

VUN.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQC.TO is Nasdaq-100. VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUN.TO and 0.20% for QQC.TO.