VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and CNCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VUN.TO tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index CAD while CNCL.TO tracks the S&P/TSX 60. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VUN.TO returned 29.34% vs 29.00% for CNCL.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUN.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNCL.TO.

Performance

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUN.TO achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than CNCL.TO's 9.70% return.

VUN.TO

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 7.17%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 29.34%
• 3Y*: 23.05%
• 5Y*: 15.50%
• 10Y*: 15.43%

CNCL.TO

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 11.65%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF	12.43%	11.43%	33.76%	8.47%
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	9.70%	22.73%	17.93%	4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VUN.TO and CNCL.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023	0.53

The correlation between VUN.TO and CNCL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUN.TO	CNCL.TO
Technology	31.5%	8.4%
Financial Services	12.5%	37.1%
Healthcare	10.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	4.1%
Industrials	9.9%	8.1%
Communication Services	9.7%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.5%
Energy	4.2%	17.2%
Utilities	2.5%	2.7%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	16.5%

Return for Risk

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUN.TO

VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CNCL.TO

CNCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
CNCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CNCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CNCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CNCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CNCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUN.TO	CNCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.48	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	3.39	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	3.66	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	17.95	-4.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the CNCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUN.TO and CNCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUN.TO	CNCL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.48	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	1.53	-0.52

Drawdowns

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, which is greater than CNCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUN.TO and CNCL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUN.TO	CNCL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.19%	-13.75%	-14.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-7.97%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.25%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-1.53%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	1.62%	+0.65%

Volatility

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUN.TO	CNCL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	2.92%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	9.97%	-1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	11.77%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.43%	12.51%	+2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	12.51%	+4.19%

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUN.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCL.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUN.TO vs. CNCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CNCL.TO's 8.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	8.49%	9.15%	11.88%	6.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF	0.74%	0.84%	0.93%	1.10%	1.21%	0.97%	1.15%	1.45%	1.52%	1.39%	1.49%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUN.TO and CNCL.TO in my portfolio?

VUN.TO and CNCL.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUN.TO or CNCL.TO?

On fees, VUN.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUN.TO or CNCL.TO?

VUN.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNCL.TO.

What is the main difference between VUN.TO and CNCL.TO?

VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD, while CNCL.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUN.TO and 0.65% for CNCL.TO.