CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO).
CNCL.TO and BRKY.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCL.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. BRKY.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Dec 19, 2022.
Performance
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 3.59% | 22.73% | 17.93% | 4.66% |
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -6.22% | 9.35% | 33.86% | 4.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNCL.TO achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BRKY.NEO's -6.22% return.
CNCL.TO
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 25.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKY.NEO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- 1Y
- -13.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCL.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKY.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
CNCL.TO
BRKY.NEO
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNCL.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | -0.67 | +2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | -0.83 | +3.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.88 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | -0.81 | +3.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | -1.29 | +12.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNCL.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | -0.67 | +2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.89 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNCL.TO and BRKY.NEO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
CNCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than BRKY.NEO's 6.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 8.90% | 9.15% | 11.88% | 6.29% | 0.00% |
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 6.90% | 5.58% | 10.93% | 5.40% | 0.49% |
Drawdowns
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, smaller than the maximum BRKY.NEO drawdown of -17.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCL.TO and BRKY.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCL.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -17.36% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -17.36% | +5.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -15.05% | +12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -5.13% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 10.91% | -8.54% |
Volatility
CNCL.TO vs. BRKY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) at 5.05%. This indicates that CNCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKY.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNCL.TO | BRKY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 5.05% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 12.07% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 20.66% | -6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 18.01% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 18.01% | -5.36% |