VUIAX vs. JHMU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VUIAX (Vanguard Utilities Index Fund Admiral Shares) and JHMU (John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF) are both funds - VUIAX is a Utilities Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while JHMU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Utilities Index. Over the past year, VUIAX returned 11.44% vs 7.41% for JHMU. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUIAX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JHMU.

Performance

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Utilities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VUIAX) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUIAX achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than JHMU's 1.83% return.

VUIAX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -5.41%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

JHMU

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VUIAX Vanguard Utilities Index Fund Admiral Shares	3.21%	16.39%	23.03%	4.29%
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	1.83%	5.03%	3.76%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VUIAX and JHMU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023	0.22

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUIAX	JHMU
Utilities	99.3%	99.0%
Energy	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

VUIAX vs. JHMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUIAX

VUIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9
VUIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
VUIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
VUIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
VUIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
VUIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

JHMU

JHMU Risk / Return Rank: 74
JHMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
JHMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JHMU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JHMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
JHMU Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VUIAX) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUIAX	JHMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	2.64	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	3.90	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.56	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	2.69	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.43	9.63	-7.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the JHMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUIAX and JHMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUIAX	JHMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	2.64	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.76	-1.23

Drawdowns

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUIAX drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than JHMU's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUIAX and JHMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUIAX	JHMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.29%	-4.48%	-41.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-2.77%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-0.43%	-6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.77%	-0.84%	-6.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	0.77%	+3.18%

Volatility

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Utilities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VUIAX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) at 0.97%. This indicates that VUIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUIAX	JHMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	0.97%	+4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	2.21%	+9.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	2.82%	+11.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.11%	4.11%	+13.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	4.11%	+15.07%

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUIAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMU's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUIAX vs. JHMU - Dividend Comparison

VUIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than JHMU's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	3.72%	4.36%	7.29%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUIAX Vanguard Utilities Index Fund Admiral Shares	2.69%	2.73%	3.01%	3.49%	2.98%	2.56%	3.17%	2.82%	3.23%	3.18%	3.19%	3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUIAX and JHMU in my portfolio?

VUIAX and JHMU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VUIAX or JHMU?

VUIAX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to JHMU (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUIAX dropped -46.29% vs JHMU's -4.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.