VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO
VUDV.TO (Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF) and ZLU.TO (BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD)) are both exchange-traded funds - VUDV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while ZLU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BMO. VUDV.TO is passively managed, while ZLU.TO is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUDV.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZLU.TO.
Performance
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VUDV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZLU.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 8.94% |
ZLU.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUDV.TO and ZLU.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VUDV.TO
ZLU.TO
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV.TO) and BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUDV.TO | ZLU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.57 | 0.97 | +6.60 |
Drawdowns
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.68%, smaller than the maximum ZLU.TO drawdown of -25.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUDV.TO and ZLU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUDV.TO | ZLU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -25.49% | +24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.03% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -3.11% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUDV.TO | ZLU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.57% | 10.46% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 11.34% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 13.91% | -6.34% |
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUDV.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLU.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUDV.TO vs. ZLU.TO - Dividend Comparison
VUDV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLU.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) | 1.73% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 1.69% | 1.75% | 1.51% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 2.26% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUDV.TO and ZLU.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUDV.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZLU.TO.
VUDV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZLU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for VUDV.TO and 0.33% for ZLU.TO.
Find the right allocation for VUDV.TO and ZLU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer