PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SYBT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUDP.F achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than SYBT.DE's 0.91% return.


VUDP.F

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
-1.75%
6M
-1.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SYBT.DE

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.91%
6M
0.10%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
0.03%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
0.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VUDP.F and SYBT.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUDP.F

SYBT.DE
SYBT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SYBT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SYBT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUDP.FSYBT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

0.35

-0.78

Drawdowns

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUDP.F drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum SYBT.DE drawdown of -17.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUDP.F and SYBT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUDP.FSYBT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-17.66%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-13.25%

+11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-8.61%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

Volatility

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUDP.FSYBT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

5.77%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.34%

8.18%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.34%

7.74%

-5.40%

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUDP.F has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SYBT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUDP.F vs. SYBT.DE - Dividend Comparison

VUDP.F has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYBT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYBT.DE
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.62%3.70%2.94%2.22%1.31%0.92%1.98%3.24%1.58%1.66%1.29%1.25%
VUDP.F
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUDP.F and SYBT.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUDP.F is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUDP.F is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SYBT.DE.

VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR, while SYBT.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VUDP.F and 0.15% for SYBT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUDP.F and SYBT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer