VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE
VUDP.F (Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing) and MDBU.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Government Bonds funds - VUDP.F tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR while MDBU.DE tracks the Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. VUDP.F charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for MDBU.DE.
Performance
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUDP.F achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than MDBU.DE's 1.02% return.
VUDP.F
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDBU.DE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.43%
- 3Y*
- 0.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- —
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUDP.F Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing | -1.75% | 1.21% |
MDBU.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.02% | -1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUDP.F and MDBU.DE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VUDP.F
MDBU.DE
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUDP.F | MDBU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.22 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUDP.F drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum MDBU.DE drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUDP.F and MDBU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUDP.F | MDBU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -12.38% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -6.60% | +4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -5.71% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.57% | — |
Volatility
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUDP.F | MDBU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34% | 5.40% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 7.21% | -4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 6.88% | -4.54% |
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUDP.F has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUDP.F vs. MDBU.DE - Dividend Comparison
VUDP.F has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDBU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBU.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.66% | 3.79% | 1.92% | 1.75% | 0.75% | 0.59% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
VUDP.F Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUDP.F and MDBU.DE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUDP.F is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUDP.F is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.DE.
VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR, while MDBU.DE tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VUDP.F and 0.18% for MDBU.DE.
Find the right allocation for VUDP.F and MDBU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer