VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Vanguard tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAG.L returned 14.93%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for VUSA.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.

Performance

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VUAG.L having a 10.56% return and VUSA.L slightly lower at 10.52%.

VUAG.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 29.04%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: —

VUSA.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 6M: 10.48%
• 1Y: 29.10%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 14.94%
• 10Y*: 16.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	10.56%	9.36%	27.33%	19.67%	-8.88%	30.97%	201.05%	9.30%
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.52%	9.39%	27.33%	19.81%	-9.02%	30.98%	13.66%	9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAG.L and VUSA.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019	0.98

The correlation between VUAG.L and VUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUAG.L	VUSA.L
Technology	35.7%	35.7%
Financial Services	11.6%	11.6%
Communication Services	11.3%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	10.2%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.5%
Industrials	8.3%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAG.L

VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

VUSA.L

VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUAG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	3.68	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.51	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	4.08	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.96	15.02	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAG.L and VUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUAG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.04	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	1.06	-0.16

Drawdowns

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VUSA.L drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and VUSA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUAG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.61%	-25.47%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-7.11%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.88%	-20.94%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.88%	-20.94%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.23%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-3.19%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.93%	+0.01%

Volatility

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUAG.L	VUSA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.63%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.17%	7.12%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	10.58%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	14.29%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.09%	15.64%	+20.45%

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VUAG.L and VUSA.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUAG.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

VUAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	71.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF	0.87%	0.95%	1.00%	1.24%	1.41%	1.04%	1.44%	1.50%	1.72%	1.61%	1.58%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUAG.L and VUSA.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, VUAG.L and VUSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, VUAG.L or VUSA.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUAG.L or VUSA.L?

VUAG.L and VUSA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

What is the main difference between VUAG.L and VUSA.L?

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index.