PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VUAG.L having a 10.56% return and VNRT.L slightly lower at 10.09%.


VUAG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.91%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*

VNRT.L

1D
0.13%
1M
4.67%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.19%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.56%9.36%27.33%19.67%-8.88%30.97%201.05%9.30%
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
10.09%8.77%26.36%19.99%-9.98%28.99%15.42%9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAG.L and VNRT.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.98

The correlation between VUAG.L and VNRT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAG.L
VNRT.L

Technology

35.7%
34.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
13.0%

Communication Services

11.3%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.2%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
4.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.4%

Technology

VUAG.L
35.7%
VNRT.L
34.4%

Financial Services

VUAG.L
11.6%
VNRT.L
13.0%

Communication Services

VUAG.L
11.3%
VNRT.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VUAG.L
10.2%
VNRT.L
9.8%

Healthcare

VUAG.L
8.5%
VNRT.L
8.2%

Industrials

VUAG.L
8.3%
VNRT.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VUAG.L
4.9%
VNRT.L
4.7%

Energy

VUAG.L
3.5%
VNRT.L
4.3%

Utilities

VUAG.L
2.4%
VNRT.L
2.3%

Real Estate

VUAG.L
1.9%
VNRT.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

VUAG.L
1.8%
VNRT.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VNRT.L
VNRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAG.LVNRT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.49

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.52

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

12.56

+2.40

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAG.L and VNRT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAG.LVNRT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.62

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.98

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.96

-0.07

Drawdowns

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VNRT.L drawdown of -26.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and VNRT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAG.LVNRT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-26.17%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-7.77%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.88%

-21.38%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-21.38%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.15%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-3.58%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.18%

-0.24%

Volatility

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAG.LVNRT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.57%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

7.12%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

10.43%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

14.36%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.09%

15.55%

+20.54%

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VNRT.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAG.L vs. VNRT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAG.L nor VNRT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
0.00%0.00%0.49%1.24%1.41%1.02%1.43%1.48%1.76%1.61%1.51%1.68%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VUAG.L and VNRT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VNRT.L.

VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VNRT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.10% for VNRT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and VNRT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer