VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L
VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAA.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for VWRD.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VUAA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRD.L.
Performance
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than VWRD.L's 11.63% return.
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRD.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 28.61%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.32% | 17.37% | 25.27% | 26.68% | -18.63% | 29.34% | 17.66% | 12.72% |
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 11.63% | 22.38% | 17.65% | 22.31% | -18.19% | 18.52% | 16.13% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAA.L and VWRD.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VUAA.L and VWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Financial Services
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Communication Services
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Healthcare
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Industrials
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Energy
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Utilities
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Real Estate
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Basic Materials
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAA.L
VWRD.L
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUAA.L | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.24 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 13.61 | +0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUAA.L | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.30 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.82 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRD.L drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and VWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAA.L | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -33.83% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -8.80% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -16.25% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -26.02% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.78% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.62% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.10% | -0.19% |
Volatility
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) is 3.18%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that VUAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAA.L | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.88% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 9.80% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 12.39% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.32% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 15.72% | +2.06% |
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAA.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
VUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VUAA.L and VWRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.
VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and VWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer