PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than VDCA.L's 1.19% return.


VUAA.L

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
7.55%
6M
7.31%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*

VDCA.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.34%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
7.55%17.37%25.27%26.68%-18.63%29.34%20.33%14.82%
VDCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
1.19%5.87%5.55%5.39%-3.80%-0.21%3.56%2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.L and VDCA.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.L
VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VDCA.L
VDCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUAA.LVDCA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.51

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

5.23

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

19.50

-8.79

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.L and VDCA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, which is greater than VDCA.L's maximum drawdown of -9.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and VDCA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.LVDCA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.05%

-9.85%

-24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-0.79%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-1.14%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-6.43%

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

0.00%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-1.05%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.21%

+1.80%

Volatility

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L) at 0.76%. This indicates that VUAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.LVDCA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

0.76%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

1.26%

+7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

1.65%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

2.13%

+13.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

3.45%

+14.33%

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VDCA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.L vs. VDCA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAA.L nor VDCA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
VDCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAA.L and VDCA.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDCA.L.

VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VDCA.L is Short-Term Bond. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while VDCA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index 1-3 Year. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.09% for VDCA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and VDCA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer