VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VDCA.L (Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and BBIL.L (JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Short-Term Bond funds - VDCA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index 1-3 Year while BBIL.L tracks the ICE BofA 0-1Y US Treasury TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDCA.L returned 2.56%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for BBIL.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDCA.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BBIL.L.

Performance

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDCA.L achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than BBIL.L's 1.45% return.

VDCA.L

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.34%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: 2.56%
• 10Y*: —

BBIL.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VDCA.L Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.77%	5.87%	5.54%	5.39%	-3.80%	-0.21%	3.56%	1.98%
BBIL.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc	1.45%	4.31%	5.16%	4.90%	1.08%	-0.03%	0.75%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VDCA.L and BBIL.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.13

Return for Risk

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDCA.L

VDCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
VDCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VDCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
VDCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
VDCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BBIL.L

BBIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
BBIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BBIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BBIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BBIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BBIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VDCA.L	BBIL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	9.48	-6.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	21.28	-16.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	4.52	-2.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.33	53.61	-48.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.94	281.29	-260.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is lower than the BBIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDCA.L and BBIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VDCA.L	BBIL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	9.48	-6.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.22	8.70	-7.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	7.42	-6.59

Drawdowns

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDCA.L drawdown since its inception was -9.85%, which is greater than BBIL.L's maximum drawdown of -0.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDCA.L and BBIL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDCA.L	BBIL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.85%	-0.29%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.80%	-0.07%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.14%	-0.10%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.43%	-0.24%	-6.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-0.03%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.01%	+0.19%

Volatility

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L) at 0.15%. This indicates that VDCA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDCA.L	BBIL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.15%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.10%	0.32%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57%	0.42%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.11%	0.39%	+1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.46%	0.36%	+3.10%

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDCA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BBIL.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VDCA.L vs. BBIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDCA.L nor BBIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDCA.L and BBIL.L in my portfolio?

VDCA.L and BBIL.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VDCA.L or BBIL.L?

On fees, VDCA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VDCA.L or BBIL.L?

VDCA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BBIL.L.

What is the main difference between VDCA.L and BBIL.L?

VDCA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index 1-3 Year, while BBIL.L tracks ICE BofA 0-1Y US Treasury TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and J.P. Morgan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDCA.L and 0.10% for BBIL.L.