VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L
VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return, while UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAA.L returned 13.22%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for UIFS.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUAA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAA.L is traded in USD, while UIFS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UIFS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAA.L achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -2.75% return.
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- —
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -1.92%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 8.41% | 17.37% | 25.27% | 26.68% | -18.63% | 29.34% | 20.33% | 14.82% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.75% | 15.15% | 30.03% | 11.72% | -11.09% | 36.82% | -3.73% | 16.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAA.L and UIFS.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between VUAA.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
Communication Services
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Healthcare
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Industrials
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
Consumer Defensive
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Energy
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Utilities
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Real Estate
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Basic Materials
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAA.L
UIFS.L
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUAA.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.08 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 0.43 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.46 | 1.07 | +11.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum UIFS.L drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAA.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -47.09% | +13.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -14.24% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -18.99% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -26.75% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -4.79% | +2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -12.62% | +7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 5.72% | -3.75% |
Volatility
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) is 3.99%, while iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that VUAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAA.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 4.40% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 10.89% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 14.28% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 23.31% | -7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 23.10% | -5.29% |
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAA.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAA.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUAA.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UIFS.L.
VUAA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while UIFS.L is Financials Equities. VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAA.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAA.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer