PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWAX vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWAX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.


VTWAX

1D
2.34%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.15%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*

EMXC

1D
0.55%
1M
3.75%
YTD
37.25%
6M
42.23%
1Y
65.26%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
10.38%22.43%16.43%21.85%-18.02%18.17%16.67%17.53%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
37.25%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWAX and EMXC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.81

The correlation between VTWAX and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWAX
EMXC

Technology

27.8%
45.0%

Financial Services

15.9%
19.6%

Industrials

12.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
4.5%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.9%

Energy

4.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.2%
6.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.0%

Technology

VTWAX
27.8%
EMXC
45.0%

Financial Services

VTWAX
15.9%
EMXC
19.6%

Industrials

VTWAX
12.0%
EMXC
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWAX
9.5%
EMXC
4.5%

Communication Services

VTWAX
8.3%
EMXC
3.4%

Healthcare

VTWAX
8.1%
EMXC
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

VTWAX
4.8%
EMXC
2.9%

Energy

VTWAX
4.3%
EMXC
4.2%

Basic Materials

VTWAX
4.2%
EMXC
6.8%

Utilities

VTWAX
2.7%
EMXC
2.3%

Real Estate

VTWAX
2.4%
EMXC
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWAX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWAX
VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWAXEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.55

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

17.51

-5.90

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWAX and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWAX drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWAX and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWAXEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.20%

-42.81%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-14.41%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-19.12%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-28.91%

+2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-4.12%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-10.17%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.74%

-1.53%

Volatility

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) is 5.19%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that VTWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWAXEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

12.83%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

21.90%

-11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

23.90%

-10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

18.00%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

20.07%

-1.84%

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWAX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWAX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

VTWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.59%1.80%1.92%2.06%2.17%1.79%1.64%2.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWAX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to VTWAX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWAX dropped -34.20% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWAX and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer