PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWAX vs. DFAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTWAX having a 13.15% return and DFAW slightly lower at 12.61%.


VTWAX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.68%
YTD
13.15%
6M
14.09%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*

DFAW

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.36%
YTD
12.61%
6M
13.91%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
13.15%22.43%16.43%11.70%
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
12.61%20.62%15.49%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWAX and DFAW is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.97

The correlation between VTWAX and DFAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWAX
DFAW

Technology

27.8%
24.8%

Financial Services

15.9%
15.5%

Industrials

12.0%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.2%

Communication Services

8.3%
7.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.0%

Energy

4.3%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.2%
5.0%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.4%

Technology

VTWAX
27.8%
DFAW
24.8%

Financial Services

VTWAX
15.9%
DFAW
15.5%

Industrials

VTWAX
12.0%
DFAW
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWAX
9.5%
DFAW
10.2%

Communication Services

VTWAX
8.3%
DFAW
7.3%

Healthcare

VTWAX
8.1%
DFAW
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

VTWAX
4.8%
DFAW
5.0%

Energy

VTWAX
4.3%
DFAW
6.0%

Basic Materials

VTWAX
4.2%
DFAW
5.0%

Utilities

VTWAX
2.7%
DFAW
2.3%

Real Estate

VTWAX
2.4%
DFAW
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWAX vs. DFAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWAX
VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAW
DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWAXDFAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.41

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

15.09

-0.83

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the DFAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWAX and DFAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWAXDFAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.52

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.62

-0.84

Drawdowns

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWAX drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, which is greater than DFAW's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWAX and DFAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWAXDFAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.20%

-16.93%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-8.88%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-1.70%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.00%

+0.15%

Volatility

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) at 3.35%. This indicates that VTWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWAXDFAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.35%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.39%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

12.03%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

14.46%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

14.46%

+3.74%

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWAX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAW's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWAX vs. DFAW - Dividend Comparison

VTWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, which matches DFAW's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
1.55%1.71%1.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWAX
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.56%1.80%1.92%2.06%2.17%1.79%1.64%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTWAX and DFAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWAX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to DFAW (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWAX dropped -34.20% vs DFAW's -16.93%.

DFAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWAX and DFAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer