PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 7.92% return.


VTV

1D
1.30%
1M
2.14%
6M
11.73%
YTD
18.44%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
9.75%

WNTR

1D
-2.34%
1M
5.36%
6M
2.42%
YTD
7.92%
1Y
106.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
44.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$668.29M$673.37M$627.33M
$3.95M$3.66M$3.95M

VTV vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
18.44%12.00%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
7.92%52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and WNTR is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTV vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.30

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

2.52

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.73

6.38

+11.36

VTV vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-42.65%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-42.65%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.95%

+11.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-20.12%

+12.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

16.84%

-15.20%

Volatility

VTV vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.83%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.23%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

13.23%

-10.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

46.95%

-39.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

54.62%

-44.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

53.31%

-39.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

53.31%

-36.69%

VTV vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTV vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than WNTR's 109.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
109.83%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and WNTR have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to VTV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.98% vs 28.99% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.98% return vs 28.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 109.83%, compared with 1.83% for VTV.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 1.00% for WNTR.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer