PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. RNSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. RNSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than RNSIX's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed RNSIX with an annualized return of 12.78%, while RNSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.77% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.93%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.78%

RNSIX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.78%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.10%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
3.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. RNSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.29%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
RNSIX
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund
0.66%7.59%7.29%9.18%-12.68%3.66%6.03%11.96%-1.28%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and RNSIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.19

Over the past year, VTV and RNSIX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. RNSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RNSIX
RNSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RNSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RNSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. RNSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVRNSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

2.70

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.04

9.41

+6.62

VTV vs. RNSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the RNSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and RNSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. RNSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than RNSIX's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and RNSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVRNSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-16.08%

-43.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-2.05%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-5.14%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-16.08%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-16.08%

-20.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-2.07%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.59%

+1.09%

Volatility

VTV vs. RNSIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX) at 0.96%. This indicates that VTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVRNSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

0.96%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

2.07%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

2.81%

+7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

4.45%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

4.48%

+12.20%

VTV vs. RNSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RNSIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTV vs. RNSIX - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than RNSIX's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNSIX
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund
6.64%6.52%6.37%5.13%8.40%4.20%4.34%5.17%5.45%5.08%5.22%5.83%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and RNSIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTV has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to RNSIX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs RNSIX's -16.08%.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and RNSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer