RNSIX vs. CLOZ

In the year-to-date period, RNSIX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 0.70% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RNSIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RNSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNSIX and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RNSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than CLOZ's 8.65% yield.

The maximum RNSIX drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNSIX and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX) is 1.41%, while Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that RNSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.