VTV vs. PVAL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VTV is passively managed, while PVAL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTV returned 12.61%/yr vs 17.44%/yr for PVAL. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PVAL.

Performance

VTV vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 19.39% return.

VTV

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 2.14%
• 6M: 11.73%
• YTD: 18.44%
• 1Y: 28.99%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 12.61%
• ALL TIME*: 9.75%

PVAL

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 4.98%
• 6M: 12.73%
• YTD: 19.39%
• 1Y: 35.43%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 17.44%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF	$116.34M	$102.81M	$92.86M
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$668.29M	$673.37M	$627.33M

VTV vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	18.44%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	7.69%
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF	19.39%	24.13%	19.30%	18.41%	-2.61%	11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and PVAL is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.93

The correlation between VTV and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTV vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTV	PVAL
Financial Services	22.4%	17.0%
Technology	15.3%	20.6%
Healthcare	15.2%	13.1%
Industrials	14.3%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	7.9%
Energy	6.9%	3.6%
Utilities	4.8%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	10.7%
Basic Materials	3.0%	4.5%
Communication Services	2.9%	0.9%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.9%

Return for Risk

VTV vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PVAL

PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 95
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTV vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VTV	PVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	3.21	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	4.48	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.58	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	4.93	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.73	19.13	-1.40

VTV vs. PVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the PVAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and PVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VTV vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and PVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTV	PVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-16.64%	-42.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-7.22%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.52%	-15.42%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.04%	-16.64%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-2.94%	-4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.86%	-0.22%

Volatility

VTV vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.83%, while Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTV	PVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	3.01%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	8.52%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	11.13%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.82%	15.23%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.62%	15.13%	+1.49%

VTV vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTV vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than PVAL's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF	0.89%	1.00%	1.34%	1.33%	0.59%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.83%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTV and PVAL in my portfolio?

VTV and PVAL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTV or PVAL?

PVAL has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to VTV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs PVAL's -16.64%.

Which ETF is better, VTV or PVAL?

On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 17.44% vs 12.61% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTV or PVAL?

Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 17.44% return vs 12.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTV or PVAL?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTV or PVAL?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.89% for PVAL.

What is the main difference between VTV and PVAL?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.55% for PVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.