VTV vs. IQLT
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.42%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for IQLT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.
Performance
VTV vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than IQLT's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed IQLT with an annualized return of 12.42%, while IQLT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
VTV vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 6.95% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and IQLT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between VTV and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTV vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
IQLT
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
IQLT
Healthcare
VTV
IQLT
Industrials
VTV
IQLT
Technology
VTV
IQLT
Consumer Defensive
VTV
IQLT
Energy
VTV
IQLT
Utilities
VTV
IQLT
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
IQLT
Communication Services
VTV
IQLT
Basic Materials
VTV
IQLT
Real Estate
VTV
IQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
IQLT
VTV vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.18 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 1.45 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.20 | 5.50 | +9.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.03 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.42 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.56 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
VTV vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -32.21% | -27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -10.38% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -13.18% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -30.24% | +13.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -32.21% | -4.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -2.64% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -6.22% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.73% | -1.05% |
Volatility
VTV vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 4.50% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 12.35% | -4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 14.67% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 16.49% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 17.00% | -0.32% |
VTV vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTV vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than IQLT's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.18% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and IQLT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 9.47% for IQLT. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.30% for IQLT.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer