PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. ERNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VTV is traded in USD, while ERNU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than ERNU.L's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed ERNU.L with an annualized return of 12.78%, while ERNU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.93%
1M
3.87%
YTD
14.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.78%

ERNU.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.64%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
2.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.29%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.54%4.92%5.60%4.92%1.31%0.61%0.84%3.84%1.87%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and ERNU.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2013

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. ERNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVERNU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.16

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

4.08

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.04

13.30

+2.73

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and ERNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than ERNU.L's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and ERNU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVERNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-37.72%

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-0.95%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-1.00%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-2.54%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-8.12%

-28.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.02%

+17.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-31.23%

+23.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.29%

+1.39%

Volatility

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) at 1.71%. This indicates that VTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVERNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

1.71%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

3.74%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

4.39%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

4.82%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

5.11%

+11.57%

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ERNU.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. ERNU.L - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than ERNU.L's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
3.29%4.68%5.46%4.99%1.56%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and ERNU.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ERNU.L.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ERNU.L is Corporate Bonds. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.09% for ERNU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and ERNU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer