PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTR vs. LMP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VTR vs. LMP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VTR is traded in USD, while LMP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LMP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTR achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than LMP.L's 0.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTR having a 6.45% annualized return and LMP.L not far behind at 6.16%.


VTR

1D
0.85%
1M
-6.36%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.02%
1Y
36.42%
3Y*
26.63%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
6.45%

LMP.L

1D
2.32%
1M
1.24%
YTD
0.72%
6M
5.99%
1Y
-3.33%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTR vs. LMP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
10.03%35.09%22.24%15.06%-8.53%7.73%-9.80%3.42%3.45%0.71%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
0.72%20.96%-2.09%23.40%-43.33%27.16%3.62%47.25%-7.83%37.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VTR and LMP.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2013

0.23

The correlation between VTR and LMP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VTR:

$41.18B

LMP.L:

£4.32B

EPS

VTR:

$0.55

LMP.L:

£0.28

PE Ratio

VTR:

153.49

LMP.L:

6.55

PEG Ratio

VTR:

4.39

LMP.L:

0.22

PS Ratio

VTR:

6.52

LMP.L:

4.86

PB Ratio

VTR:

3.14

LMP.L:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

VTR:

$6.13B

LMP.L:

£867.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VTR:

-$261.17M

LMP.L:

£854.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

VTR:

$2.45B

LMP.L:

£828.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTR vs. LMP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTR
VTR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LMP.L
LMP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LMP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LMP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTR vs. LMP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTRLMP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.99

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

-0.20

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

-0.37

+11.40

VTR vs. LMP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the LMP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTR and LMP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTR vs. LMP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTR drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than LMP.L's maximum drawdown of -53.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTR and LMP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTRLMP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.84%

-53.28%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-16.83%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-22.97%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.80%

-53.28%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.92%

-53.28%

-23.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-16.91%

+10.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-13.56%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

9.08%

-5.77%

Volatility

VTR vs. LMP.L - Volatility Comparison

Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) at 5.91%. This indicates that VTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTRLMP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

5.91%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.88%

15.47%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.35%

19.56%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.02%

27.63%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.78%

27.79%

+6.99%

Dividends

VTR vs. LMP.L - Dividend Comparison

VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than LMP.L's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
6.71%6.54%6.16%5.07%5.48%3.12%3.71%3.55%4.60%4.09%4.73%3.35%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.32%2.48%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%20.47%

Financials

VTR vs. LMP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ventas, Inc. and LondonMetric Property plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.66B
238.90M
(VTR) Total Revenue
(LMP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VTR values in USD, LMP.L values in GBP

VTR vs. LMP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ventas, Inc. and LondonMetric Property plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
97.9%
Portfolio components
VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

LMP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a gross profit of 233.80M and revenue of 238.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.9%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

LMP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported an operating income of 217.10M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

LMP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a net income of 165.40M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in a net margin of 69.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VTR and LMP.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTR and LMP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer