PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTMGX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTMGX achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 10.72% return.


VTMGX

1D
0.04%
1M
3.10%
YTD
16.54%
6M
16.37%
1Y
34.33%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
10.99%

FHLFX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.07%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.36%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
16.54%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-12.44%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
10.72%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMGX and FHLFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.98

The correlation between VTMGX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTMGX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTMGXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.26

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

8.44

+3.18

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMGX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMGX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMGX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMGXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-33.58%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-11.37%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-13.62%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-29.36%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-6.07%

-8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.03%

+0.01%

Volatility

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.75%. This indicates that VTMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMGXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

4.75%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

12.71%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

15.27%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

16.06%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

17.65%

-1.09%

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMGX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTMGX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

VTMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.13%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.49%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VTMGX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTMGX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to FHLFX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMGX dropped -60.58% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

VTMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTMGX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer