VTIP vs. GLDM
VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTIP returned 3.21%/yr vs 17.18%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTIP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
VTIP vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTIP achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -7.15% return.
VTIP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.22%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- YTD
- -7.15%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.27%
VTIP vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.84% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -2.94% | 5.36% | 4.95% | 4.86% | 0.10% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -7.15% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTIP and GLDM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between VTIP and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTIP vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
VTIP
GLDM
VTIP vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTIP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.15 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 0.75 | +4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 1.75 | +13.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTIP vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTIP drawdown since its inception was -6.27%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIP and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTIP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -26.27% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.71% | -26.27% | +25.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -26.27% | +25.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | -26.27% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -25.76% | +25.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.03% | -6.48% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 11.22% | -11.00% |
Volatility
VTIP vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is 0.44%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTIP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 6.39% | -5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 24.04% | -22.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57% | 27.86% | -26.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 18.32% | -15.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 17.07% | -14.33% |
VTIP vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTIP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTIP vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 4.15% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTIP and GLDM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VTIP (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIP dropped -6.27% vs GLDM's -26.27%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.18% vs 3.21% for VTIP. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.18% return vs 3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.
VTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
VTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GLDM is Gold. VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTIP and 0.10% for GLDM.
VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTIP and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer