PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTIP vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTIP vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTIP achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.44% return.


VTIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.14%

FLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTIP vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.05%6.07%4.74%4.62%-2.94%5.36%4.95%4.86%0.28%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.44%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VTIP and FLDR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018

0.35

The correlation between VTIP and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.58 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTIP vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTIP
VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTIP vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIPFLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

2.75

-1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.75

10.24

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.06

70.25

-44.18

VTIP vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTIP and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIPFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

5.95

-2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

3.07

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.62

+0.28

Drawdowns

VTIP vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTIP drawdown since its inception was -6.27%, smaller than the maximum FLDR drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIP and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIPFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-12.23%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.70%

-0.47%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-0.76%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

-2.33%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.02%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-0.35%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.07%

+0.11%

Volatility

VTIP vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) has a higher volatility of 0.43% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that VTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIPFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.19%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

0.58%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

0.80%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

1.21%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.74%

5.26%

-2.52%

VTIP vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTIP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTIP vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than FLDR's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.43%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%0.00%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.58%3.81%2.70%2.86%6.84%4.68%1.20%1.95%2.45%1.52%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTIP and FLDR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTIP has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIP dropped -6.27% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.70% vs 3.37% for VTIP. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.70% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.58% for VTIP.

VTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FLDR is Corporate Bonds. VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTIP and 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTIP and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer