PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTG vs. CSHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTG vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.86% return.


VTG

1D
0.09%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSHP

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTG vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTG and CSHP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTG vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTG vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTGCSHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

6.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

65.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

395.75

VTG vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTG vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and CSHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTGCSHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-0.08%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.01%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-0.00%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

Volatility

VTG vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTGCSHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

0.36%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.52%

0.41%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.52%

0.41%

+3.11%

VTG vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTG vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
3.91%5.39%1.96%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.20%1.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTG and CSHP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.

VTG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTG and 0.20% for CSHP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTG and CSHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer