VTG vs. CSHP
VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. VTG is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. VTG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
VTG vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.86% return.
VTG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTG vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.11% | 3.07% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.86% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTG and CSHP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTG vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
VTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSHP
VTG vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTG | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 6.67 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 65.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 395.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTG vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTG | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -0.08% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.01% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.00% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
VTG vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTG | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 0.36% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 0.41% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 0.41% | +3.11% |
VTG vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTG vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTG and CSHP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.
VTG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTG and 0.20% for CSHP.
Find the right allocation for VTG and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer