PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTG vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTG vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.30% return.


VTG

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.25%
6M
-0.29%
YTD
-0.15%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIV

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.24%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
-0.30%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTG vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTG and BIV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.97

The correlation between VTG and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTG vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTG vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTGBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.06

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

2.82

-0.34

VTG vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTG and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTG vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTGBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-18.95%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-3.18%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-2.10%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-3.38%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

1.19%

-0.10%

Volatility

VTG vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) is 1.10%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that VTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTGBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.31%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

3.11%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

4.04%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.53%

6.41%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

5.50%

-1.97%

VTG vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VTG and BIV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTG vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than BIV's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.26%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.54%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VTG and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIV has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to VTG (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTG dropped -2.89% vs BIV's -18.95%.

On 1-year performance, BIV leads with 3.73% vs 3.10% for VTG. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIV has performed better with a 3.73% return vs 3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG and BIV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.54% for VTG.

VTG is categorized as Government Bonds, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index.

BIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTG and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer