PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTEI vs. RVNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTEI vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEI) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTEI achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.90% return.


VTEI

1D
0.09%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RVNU

1D
0.18%
1M
1.50%
YTD
3.90%
6M
3.22%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTEI vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTEI and RVNU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.60

The correlation between VTEI and RVNU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTEI vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTEI
VTEI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTEI vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEI) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTEIRVNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.35

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.82

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

11.40

-3.57

VTEI vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTEI and RVNU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTEIRVNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.84

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.39

+0.65

Drawdowns

VTEI vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTEI drawdown since its inception was -3.64%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEI and RVNU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTEIRVNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-23.51%

+19.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-2.46%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-2.63%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-4.98%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.83%

-0.04%

Volatility

VTEI vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEI) is 0.78%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that VTEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTEIRVNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

1.43%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

3.41%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

5.12%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

7.19%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.04%

7.27%

-4.23%

VTEI vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTEI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTEI vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

VTEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than RVNU's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.51%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%
VTEI
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.05%3.00%2.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTEI and RVNU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVNU has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to VTEI (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTEI dropped -3.64% vs RVNU's -23.51%.

On 1-year performance, RVNU leads with 9.36% vs 6.21% for VTEI. On fees, VTEI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VTEI has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RVNU has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for RVNU.

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 3.05% for VTEI.

VTEI tracks S&P Intermediate Term National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VTEI and 0.15% for RVNU.

VTEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTEI and RVNU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer