PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTEI vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTEI vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VTEI

1D
0.09%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTEI vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTEI vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTEI
VTEI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTEI vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTEIIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

VTEI vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTEIIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

Drawdowns

VTEI vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTEI drawdown since its inception was -3.64%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEI and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTEIIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

0.00%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

0.00%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

Volatility

VTEI vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTEIIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

0.00%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

0.00%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.04%

0.00%

+3.04%

VTEI vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTEI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTEI vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

VTEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, VTEI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTEI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMM.

VTEI has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

VTEI tracks S&P Intermediate Term National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VTEI and 0.18% for IBMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTEI and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer