PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTAPX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTAPX achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VTAPX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 3.13%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


VTAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
3.13%

FBGRX

1D
-0.31%
1M
7.83%
YTD
18.19%
6M
19.03%
1Y
43.35%
3Y*
32.41%
5Y*
16.66%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.05%6.03%4.73%4.59%-2.84%5.26%4.97%4.85%0.53%0.82%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
18.19%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VTAPX and FBGRX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.05

The correlation between VTAPX and FBGRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTAPX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTAPX
VTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTAPXFBGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.44

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.56

3.54

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.05

14.99

+11.07

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTAPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTAPX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTAPXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.57

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

0.67

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.41

0.93

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.68

+0.39

Drawdowns

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTAPX drawdown since its inception was -5.33%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTAPX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTAPXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-58.64%

+53.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-12.65%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.92%

-27.07%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.33%

-43.08%

+37.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.33%

-43.08%

+37.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.31%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-12.53%

+11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

2.98%

-2.80%

Volatility

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX) is 0.56%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that VTAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTAPXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

4.19%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

13.01%

-11.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52%

17.43%

-15.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.67%

24.88%

-22.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

23.68%

-21.45%

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTAPX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTAPX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

VTAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.61%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.55%3.78%2.68%2.84%6.82%4.67%1.19%1.94%2.45%1.52%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTAPX and FBGRX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to VTAPX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTAPX dropped -5.33% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

VTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTAPX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer