PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTABX vs. VFSUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTABX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than VFSUX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VTABX has underperformed VFSUX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while VFSUX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.


VTABX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.91%
1Y
1.74%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
1.77%

VFSUX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.56%2.96%3.92%8.77%-12.92%-2.22%4.54%8.83%2.97%2.39%
VFSUX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
0.72%6.87%5.08%6.17%-5.75%-0.62%5.26%5.85%0.98%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VTABX and VFSUX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.57

The correlation between VTABX and VFSUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTABX
VFSUX

Technology

100.0%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Communication Services

0.0%
100.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Technology

VTABX
100.0%
VFSUX
0.1%

Real Estate

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX
0.0%

Financial Services

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX

-

Industrials

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX

-

Energy

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX

-

Utilities

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX

-

Communication Services

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX
100.0%

Healthcare

VTABX
0.0%
VFSUX
100.0%

Basic Materials

VTABX

-

VFSUX

-

Consumer Cyclical

VTABX

-

VFSUX

-

Consumer Defensive

VTABX

-

VFSUX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTABX vs. VFSUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTABX
VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VFSUX
VFSUX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VFSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTABXVFSUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.71

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

10.58

-8.74

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the VFSUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTABX and VFSUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTABX drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, which is greater than VFSUX's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTABX and VFSUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTABXVFSUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-9.24%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-1.71%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.90%

-1.71%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-9.24%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.16%

-9.24%

-6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.33%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-0.87%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.44%

+0.62%

Volatility

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX) at 0.77%. This indicates that VTABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFSUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTABXVFSUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

0.77%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

1.69%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

2.32%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

2.99%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

2.49%

+1.13%

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VTABX and VFSUX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTABX vs. VFSUX - Dividend Comparison

VTABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than VFSUX's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFSUX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
4.72%4.59%4.16%3.14%2.03%1.79%2.34%2.92%2.79%2.11%2.14%2.09%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.46%4.36%4.33%4.39%1.48%3.70%1.08%4.28%3.00%2.23%1.80%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTABX and VFSUX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTABX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to VFSUX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTABX dropped -16.16% vs VFSUX's -9.24%.

VFSUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTABX and VFSUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer