PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTABX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTABX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTABX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 36.38% return. Over the past 10 years, VTABX has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 1.79%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.


VTABX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.39%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
1.79%

FSENX

1D
1.00%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
36.38%
6M
32.95%
1Y
56.07%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTABX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.40%2.96%3.92%8.77%-12.92%-2.22%4.54%8.83%2.97%2.39%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
36.38%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VTABX and FSENX is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

-0.16

The correlation between VTABX and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTABX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTABX
VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTABX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTABXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

5.35

-4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

15.73

-13.89

VTABX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTABX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTABXFSENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

2.71

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.82

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.32

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.32

+0.41

Drawdowns

VTABX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTABX drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTABX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTABXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-76.24%

+60.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-9.95%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.90%

-25.85%

+22.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-28.02%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.16%

-72.11%

+55.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-4.14%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-17.01%

+13.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

3.38%

-2.35%

Volatility

VTABX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) is 1.31%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that VTABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTABXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

7.62%

-6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

15.36%

-12.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04%

19.69%

-16.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.44%

27.26%

-22.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.61%

30.96%

-27.35%

VTABX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTABX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTABX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

VTABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than FSENX's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.57%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.47%4.36%4.33%4.39%1.48%3.70%1.08%4.28%3.00%2.23%1.80%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTABX and FSENX have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to VTABX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTABX dropped -16.16% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTABX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer